<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD looking to produce Intel Atom-beating CPU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/06/08/amd-looking-to-produce-intel-atom-beating-cpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/06/08/amd-looking-to-produce-intel-atom-beating-cpu/</link>
	<description>All things Netbook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:12:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/06/08/amd-looking-to-produce-intel-atom-beating-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-3786</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=3163#comment-3786</guid>
		<description>About bloody time.  Those of us who boycott companies who fund the Israeli occupation of Palestine have been forced to miss out...  Let&#039;s hope they hurry up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About bloody time.  Those of us who boycott companies who fund the Israeli occupation of Palestine have been forced to miss out&#8230;  Let&#8217;s hope they hurry up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faz</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/06/08/amd-looking-to-produce-intel-atom-beating-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Faz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=3163#comment-916</guid>
		<description>AMD really did miss out on this on, which is a real shame. AMD, in my opinion, has always produced more efficient processors at lower cost. It&#039;s a little late now, though still better than never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD really did miss out on this on, which is a real shame. AMD, in my opinion, has always produced more efficient processors at lower cost. It&#8217;s a little late now, though still better than never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpencerUk</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/06/08/amd-looking-to-produce-intel-atom-beating-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>SpencerUk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=3163#comment-902</guid>
		<description>About time!

the Athlon Neo chip beat Atom all ends up, I want something like that in my next portable device.

C&#039;mon AMD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About time!</p>
<p>the Athlon Neo chip beat Atom all ends up, I want something like that in my next portable device.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon AMD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
