<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel’s Cedar Trail will be 32nm; supports DDR3 memory &amp; HD video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/</link>
	<description>All things Netbook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/comment-page-1/#comment-6373</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=5743#comment-6373</guid>
		<description>Hey Bakeman, I get what you said about economics which is why I gave similar thoughts in last line. I was just wondering why the next versions can&#039;t be *significantly* more evolutionary and thereby more productive than the earlier version. Why Vista after XP .. then long wait for Win7. Vista should have been better than XP is what I am whining about. What made a good co. like MS come out with Vista in between &amp; spoil the show (maybe MS retrenched Vista programmers by now ;-) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bakeman, I get what you said about economics which is why I gave similar thoughts in last line. I was just wondering why the next versions can&#8217;t be *significantly* more evolutionary and thereby more productive than the earlier version. Why Vista after XP .. then long wait for Win7. Vista should have been better than XP is what I am whining about. What made a good co. like MS come out with Vista in between &amp; spoil the show (maybe MS retrenched Vista programmers by now <img src='http://www.netbookchoice.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bakeman</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/comment-page-1/#comment-6372</link>
		<dc:creator>Bakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=5743#comment-6372</guid>
		<description>Bob,

&quot;why couldn’t MS carry on with XP and then jump directly to Win7&quot;

It is a project cycle, it is an economy growing cycle. They could, however, one new version of Window each year. But this is same as killing goose and get it golden egg. You produce something too fast, but too less people afford the upgrade, then you are wasting too much resource on the development, you bussiness won&#039;t be good.

If they produce Window too slow, then the low level worker such as marketing department may be idle, no work to do because no people want to purchase Window, cause they already have one installed on their computer. Then microsoft will have to retrench some worker to cut cost. This is certainly not a good sign for a famous company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>&#8220;why couldn’t MS carry on with XP and then jump directly to Win7&#8243;</p>
<p>It is a project cycle, it is an economy growing cycle. They could, however, one new version of Window each year. But this is same as killing goose and get it golden egg. You produce something too fast, but too less people afford the upgrade, then you are wasting too much resource on the development, you bussiness won&#8217;t be good.</p>
<p>If they produce Window too slow, then the low level worker such as marketing department may be idle, no work to do because no people want to purchase Window, cause they already have one installed on their computer. Then microsoft will have to retrench some worker to cut cost. This is certainly not a good sign for a famous company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedar Trail: Neue Atom-Prozessoren ab 2011 &#187; Intel &#187; Netbux</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/comment-page-1/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedar Trail: Neue Atom-Prozessoren ab 2011 &#187; Intel &#187; Netbux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=5743#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>[...] via Netbookchoice / [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Netbookchoice / [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/comment-page-1/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=5743#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>Then why not introduce Cedarview itself from the start ... why test the grounds with Pineview when the competition (namely: AMD + few others) are already hot on their heels with &quot;all-of-the-above&quot;.

IF at all there can be a parallel ... it can be that of Windows coming out with Vista ... why couldn&#039;t MS carry on with XP and then jump directly to Win7 ..  Pinetrail is a bettered version of present ATOM chips, I feel , so there&#039;s nothing fabulous to carry on home about. Whats out of the ordinary, is Cedarview as of now. Am sure there can only be a very good &#039;commercial, market-led&#039; reason for Intel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why not introduce Cedarview itself from the start &#8230; why test the grounds with Pineview when the competition (namely: AMD + few others) are already hot on their heels with &#8220;all-of-the-above&#8221;.</p>
<p>IF at all there can be a parallel &#8230; it can be that of Windows coming out with Vista &#8230; why couldn&#8217;t MS carry on with XP and then jump directly to Win7 ..  Pinetrail is a bettered version of present ATOM chips, I feel , so there&#8217;s nothing fabulous to carry on home about. Whats out of the ordinary, is Cedarview as of now. Am sure there can only be a very good &#8216;commercial, market-led&#8217; reason for Intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

