Comments on: Intel’s Cedar Trail will be 32nm; supports DDR3 memory & HD video http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/ All things Netbook Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:47:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Cedar Trail: Neue Atom-Prozessoren ab 2011 » Intel » Netbux http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/comment-page-1/#comment-3013 Cedar Trail: Neue Atom-Prozessoren ab 2011 » Intel » Netbux Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:52:46 +0000 http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=5743#comment-3013 [...] via Netbookchoice / [...] [...] via Netbookchoice / [...]

]]> By: Bob http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/20/intel%e2%80%99s-cedar-trail-will-be-32nm-supports-ddr3-memory-hd-video/comment-page-1/#comment-2956 Bob Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:16:27 +0000 http://www.netbookchoice.com/?p=5743#comment-2956 Then why not introduce Cedarview itself from the start ... why test the grounds with Pineview when the competition (namely: AMD + few others) are already hot on their heels with "all-of-the-above". IF at all there can be a parallel ... it can be that of Windows coming out with Vista ... why couldn't MS carry on with XP and then jump directly to Win7 .. Pinetrail is a bettered version of present ATOM chips, I feel , so there's nothing fabulous to carry on home about. Whats out of the ordinary, is Cedarview as of now. Am sure there can only be a very good 'commercial, market-led' reason for Intel. Then why not introduce Cedarview itself from the start … why test the grounds with Pineview when the competition (namely: AMD + few others) are already hot on their heels with “all-of-the-above”.

IF at all there can be a parallel … it can be that of Windows coming out with Vista … why couldn’t MS carry on with XP and then jump directly to Win7 .. Pinetrail is a bettered version of present ATOM chips, I feel , so there’s nothing fabulous to carry on home about. Whats out of the ordinary, is Cedarview as of now. Am sure there can only be a very good ‘commercial, market-led’ reason for Intel.

]]>